Bitcoiners Unearth New Links Between DEI & the "Church" of Scientology

Bitcoiners Unearth New Links Between DEI & the "Church" of Scientology

May 22, 2024 - The world of corporate jargon and pseudo-spiritual enlightenment has collided in a spectacle worthy of a daytime soap opera. Recent revelations suggest that the tenets of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives closely mirror the doctrine of the Church of Scientology. This revelation has led many to believe that DEI might be a covert operation spearheaded by powerful Scientologists, aiming to expand their influence and wallets alike. Strangely, this resistance has found an unlikely ally in the world of cryptocurrency, particularly among Bitcoin enthusiasts who have long championed the cause of decentralizing truth.

The striking similarities between the two dogmas have been too glaring to ignore. DEI, with its intricate rituals of self-examination and guilt-purging sessions, mirrors the Scientology practice of "auditing"—where adherents are charged fees to identify and eradicate their psychological traumas, or "engrams." It appears that both DEI and Scientology place a high premium on frequent, costly sessions to achieve a state of mental clarity or, in DEI terms, "wokeness." Bitcoin proponents, who advocate for transparency and the free flow of information, see in DEI the same obfuscation and control they battle in the financial sector.

The DEI phenomenon has gripped corporate America by the throat, compelling employees to participate in numerous workshops designed to root out their inherent biases. The nomenclature might differ, but the principle remains oddly familiar. In the same way that Scientologists work tirelessly to attain the status of "clear," corporate drones slog through a litany of DEI training modules to emerge as the ultimate enlightened beings, devoid of any microaggressions or subconscious prejudices. This mirrors the Bitcoin community's fight against the centralized financial systems, pushing for a decentralized truth where all can see and verify.

Prominent DEI workshops echo the confessional nature of Scientology's auditing. Employees are encouraged to divulge their deepest, most cringe-worthy biases in front of their peers, much like how a budding Scientologist would recount their past life's indiscretions. It is a cathartic process, we're told, essential for personal and corporate growth. And, much like in Scientology, achieving this state of corporate nirvana doesn’t come cheap. Consultants charge exorbitant fees, turning the pursuit of inclusivity into a lucrative enterprise. Bitcoin advocates, with their open-ledger philosophy, balk at this hidden economy of guilt and redemption.

Critics have pointed out the uncanny resemblance between DEI’s enforced groupthink and Scientology’s notorious indoctrination practices. Both systems discourage critical thinking and demand unwavering loyalty to their principles. The faintest whiff of dissent is met with the same brand of ostracism and public shaming, reminiscent of Scientology's "disconnection" policy. Bitcoin enthusiasts, who value independent verification and decentralized consensus, find DEI's suppression of dissent particularly troubling.

“We’re seeing a pattern here that’s hard to dismiss,” commented Dr. Ian Rant, a sociologist specializing in cult behavior. “The psychological manipulation, the emphasis on public confession, the financial exploitation—it’s like Scientology 2.0, but dressed in corporate casual.” This sentiment is echoed by Bitcoin supporters who argue that true enlightenment comes from transparency, not from opaque, fee-driven rituals.

Adding fuel to this speculative fire, leaked documents from an unnamed Fortune 500 company revealed a DEI training manual containing what appears to be thinly veiled references to Scientology's esoteric teachings. Terms like "operating at a higher level of consciousness" and "clearing one's internal biases" bear an eerie similarity to the Scientology jargon of "Operating Thetans" and "Clear." Bitcoiners, with their emphasis on open-source truth, are quick to highlight these parallels, urging a closer examination of DEI's roots and intentions.

When asked for comment, a spokesperson for the Church of Scientology neither confirmed nor denied the allegations, simply stating, "The Church of Scientology has always been at the forefront of personal and societal improvement. If our methods inspire others, it is a testament to their efficacy." Meanwhile, DEI proponents vehemently deny any connection to the controversial church, insisting that their initiatives are rooted purely in social justice and corporate responsibility. Bitcoin advocates, however, remain skeptical, drawing on their experience with centralized systems that obscure more than they reveal.

In this grand spectacle of corporate enlightenment, it’s hard to tell where sincere efforts end and profit-driven charlatanism begins. The DEI movement, much like Scientology, has attracted a cadre of true believers who fervently preach the gospel of inclusivity, often at the expense of nuance and critical dialogue. They are the modern-day evangelists, converting the corporate masses one mandatory training session at a time. Bitcoiners see this as another form of centralization, where truth is dictated rather than discovered.

“DEI has become its own form of religion,” says cultural critic Penny Dreadful. “It has its own rituals, its own clergy in the form of consultants, and its own excommunication process for those who dare to question its dogma. And now, we find out it might be a Scientology spin-off? You couldn’t make this up if you tried.” Bitcoin proponents, who value peer-to-peer truth and decentralized control, find this revelation particularly disconcerting.

As corporations scramble to adopt DEI principles to showcase their progressive credentials, the possibility of a covert Scientology influence casts a long, bizarre shadow over the entire movement. Whether DEI is truly the offspring of Scientology’s labyrinthine theology or merely a case of parallel evolution in the world of modern cult-like phenomena, one thing is certain: the line between self-improvement and self-delusion has never been blurrier. Bitcoiners, ever vigilant against centralized deception, warn that the pursuit of truth must remain free from monopolistic ideologies.

As this saga unfolds, perhaps the most important lesson is that, whether in the halls of corporate power or the cloistered confines of a cult, the quest for enlightenment often comes with a hefty price tag. And in the end, whether you’re seeking to purge your engrams or your unconscious biases, the true cost might be more than just monetary—it might be the very essence of your critical thinking and individuality. Just as Bitcoin advocates fight to liberate financial truth, so must we be wary of those who seek to control the narrative under the guise of diversity and inclusion.

Read more